einvoicecheck
Menu

Rules / UBL-CR-680 · Markdown

Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule

UBL-CR-680

Layer en16931·Checked against Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 2026.5

What does UBL-CR-680 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the PaymentMeans/PayerFinancialAccount

Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-680?

The cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PayerFinancialAccount element should not be used in an EN 16931 UBL invoice. In the core model the debited (payer) account for direct debit belongs in cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount (BT-91), not directly under PaymentMeans, so a PayerFinancialAccount under PaymentMeans is outside the core model and validators warn.

Official rule text

A UBL invoice should not include the PaymentMeans/PayerFinancialAccount

Common causes

How do I fix it?

<cac:PaymentMeans>
  <cbc:PaymentMeansCode>59</cbc:PaymentMeansCode>
  <cac:PaymentMandate>
    <cbc:ID>MANDATE-1</cbc:ID>
    <cac:PayerFinancialAccount>
      <cbc:ID>SI56011000000000123</cbc:ID>
    </cac:PayerFinancialAccount>
  </cac:PaymentMandate>
</cac:PaymentMeans>

Related rules

UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008

Check your invoice against this rule

Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.