Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-680
What does UBL-CR-680 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the PaymentMeans/PayerFinancialAccount
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-680?
The cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PayerFinancialAccount element should not be used in an EN 16931 UBL invoice. In the core model the debited (payer) account for direct debit belongs in cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount (BT-91), not directly under PaymentMeans, so a PayerFinancialAccount under PaymentMeans is outside the core model and validators warn.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the PaymentMeans/PayerFinancialAccount
Common causes
- Direct debit account placed under PaymentMeans instead of inside PaymentMandate
- Reusing generic UBL 2.1 payment structures not restricted to EN 16931
How do I fix it?
<cac:PaymentMeans>
<cbc:PaymentMeansCode>59</cbc:PaymentMeansCode>
<cac:PaymentMandate>
<cbc:ID>MANDATE-1</cbc:ID>
<cac:PayerFinancialAccount>
<cbc:ID>SI56011000000000123</cbc:ID>
</cac:PayerFinancialAccount>
</cac:PaymentMandate>
</cac:PaymentMeans>
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.