Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-620
What does UBL-CR-620 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine Item InformationContentProviderParty
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-620?
The official rule states: "A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine Item InformationContentProviderParty". The InformationContentProviderParty element under InvoiceLine/Item (Item) exists in the generic UBL 2.1 schema but is not mapped to any EN 16931 business term, so a core-compliant invoice must leave it out. Receivers validating against EN 16931 will flag it because data in unmapped elements cannot be reliably processed.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine Item InformationContentProviderParty
Common causes
- A UBL generator or ERP export serialising every optional UBL element instead of only those mapped to EN 16931 business terms
- Reusing a UBL template from an order, catalogue or logistics document where this element is common
- Mapping internal product-master or supply-chain data wholesale into the invoice line
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.