Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-394
What does UBL-CR-394 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty PostalAddress
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-394?
The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty/cac:PostalAddress should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. The deliver-to address (BG-15) is carried on cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address, not on the delivery party; the party itself supports only its name (BT-70).
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty PostalAddress
Common causes
- Mapping the delivery address onto the party (as is done for buyer/seller) instead of onto DeliveryLocation
- Duplicating the address in both DeliveryLocation and DeliveryParty
How do I fix it?
<cac:Delivery>
<cac:DeliveryLocation>
<cac:Address>
<cbc:StreetName>Slovenska cesta 1</cbc:StreetName>
<cbc:CityName>Ljubljana</cbc:CityName>
<cbc:PostalZone>1000</cbc:PostalZone>
<cac:Country><cbc:IdentificationCode>SI</cbc:IdentificationCode></cac:Country>
</cac:Address>
</cac:DeliveryLocation>
<cac:DeliveryParty>
<cac:PartyName><cbc:Name>Warehouse Ljubljana</cbc:Name></cac:PartyName>
</cac:DeliveryParty>
</cac:Delivery>
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.