How do I fix UBL-CR-392?

7300010000001 Warehouse Ljubljana

Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule

UBL-CR-392

Layer en16931·Checked against Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 2026.5

What does UBL-CR-392 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty PartyIdentification

Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-392?

The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty/cac:PartyIdentification should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. In the core model the deliver-to location identifier is BT-71, carried on cac:DeliveryLocation/cbc:ID, not as a party identification of the delivery party.

Official rule text

A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty PartyIdentification

Common causes

Mapping the location ID (e.g. a GLN) onto the party instead of DeliveryLocation/cbc:ID
Reusing buyer/seller party mapping code, where PartyIdentification is valid, for the delivery party

How do I fix it?

<cac:Delivery>
  <cac:DeliveryLocation>
    <cbc:ID schemeID="0088">7300010000001</cbc:ID>
  </cac:DeliveryLocation>
  <cac:DeliveryParty>
    <cac:PartyName><cbc:Name>Warehouse Ljubljana</cbc:Name></cac:PartyName>
  </cac:DeliveryParty>
</cac:Delivery>

Check your invoice against this rule

Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.