Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-390
What does UBL-CR-390 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty EndpointID
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-390?
The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty/cbc:EndpointID should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. Electronic addresses (endpoint IDs) are defined only for the seller (BT-34) and buyer (BT-49); the deliver-to party has no endpoint business term.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty EndpointID
Common causes
- Reusing the buyer party structure (which has an EndpointID) for the delivery party
- Party serializer emitting EndpointID for every party
- Assuming all parties need a Peppol participant ID
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.