Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-384
What does UBL-CR-384 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery EstimatedDeliveryPeriod
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-384?
The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:EstimatedDeliveryPeriod should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. The core standard records only the actual delivery date (BT-72); estimated periods belong to ordering/logistics documents and are not part of the invoice model.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery EstimatedDeliveryPeriod
Common causes
- Order or despatch-advice data structures reused for the invoice
- Mapping a delivery window from the ERP into EstimatedDeliveryPeriod
- Emitting every optional Delivery child element
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.