Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-383
What does UBL-CR-383 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery RequestedDeliveryPeriod
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-383?
The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:RequestedDeliveryPeriod should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. The invoice carries the actual delivery date (BT-72, cbc:ActualDeliveryDate) and the invoicing period (BG-14); a requested delivery period is order-level information outside the core invoice model.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery RequestedDeliveryPeriod
Common causes
- Copying delivery data from the purchase order, where RequestedDeliveryPeriod is valid
- Mapping the invoicing period into the wrong element instead of cac:InvoicePeriod
- Serializer emitting all Delivery sub-elements
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.