Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-382
What does UBL-CR-382 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery AlternativeDeliveryLocation
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-382?
The UBL element cac:Delivery/cac:AlternativeDeliveryLocation should not be used in an EN 16931 invoice. The core standard supports exactly one delivery location per invoice (via cac:DeliveryLocation); alternative locations are not part of the model.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery AlternativeDeliveryLocation
Common causes
- Mapping a secondary/fallback delivery address from the order into the invoice
- Reusing order or despatch UBL structures that legitimately carry alternatives
- Emitting all Delivery children supported by UBL 2.1
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.