How do I fix UBL-CR-367?

Slovenska cesta 5 Ljubljana 1000 SI -->

Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule

UBL-CR-367

Layer en16931·Checked against Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 2026.5

What does UBL-CR-367 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address BuildingNumber

Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-367?

The invoice should not contain the BuildingNumber element on the delivery address (cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:BuildingNumber). In EN 16931 the house number is part of the street/address line terms (BT-75 etc.), not a separate element, so cbc:BuildingNumber is outside the core model.

Official rule text

A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address BuildingNumber

Common causes

Street name and house number are stored separately in the ERP and serialised as separate UBL elements
Reuse of a national address format that splits out the building number

How do I fix it?

<cac:Address>
  <cbc:StreetName>Slovenska cesta 5</cbc:StreetName>
  <cbc:CityName>Ljubljana</cbc:CityName>
  <cbc:PostalZone>1000</cbc:PostalZone>
  <cac:Country><cbc:IdentificationCode>SI</cbc:IdentificationCode></cac:Country>
</cac:Address>
<!-- concatenate the number into StreetName; drop <cbc:BuildingNumber> -->

Check your invoice against this rule

Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.