Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-366
What does UBL-CR-366 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address BuildingName
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-366?
The invoice should not contain the BuildingName element on the delivery address (cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:BuildingName). Building names have no dedicated term in the EN 16931 address model; if relevant, they should be included in an address line of the deliver-to address (BG-15).
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address BuildingName
Common causes
- A building-name field from the source system is mapped to cbc:BuildingName instead of an address line
- Schema-complete serialisation of the UBL Address type
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.