Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-361
What does UBL-CR-361 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address AddressFormatCode
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-361?
The invoice should not contain the AddressFormatCode element on the delivery address (cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cac:Address/cbc:AddressFormatCode). Address format codes have no business term in EN 16931, whose address model is a fixed structured set of fields, so this element is outside the core.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery DeliveryLocation Address AddressFormatCode
Common causes
- Formatting metadata from an address-management system is included in the export
- Reuse of a full UBL 2.1 address template
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.