Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-339
What does UBL-CR-339 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty ServiceProviderParty
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-339?
The invoice should not contain the ServiceProviderParty element under the tax representative party (cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:ServiceProviderParty). EN 16931 has no business terms for service providers attached to the tax representative, so this structure is outside the core model.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty ServiceProviderParty
Common causes
- E-invoicing service-provider details are embedded in the party structure by the sending platform
- Schema-complete serialisation of the UBL Party type
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.