Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-318
What does UBL-CR-318 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty PostalAddress CitySubdivisionName
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-318?
cbc:CitySubdivisionName inside cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PostalAddress is not part of the EN 16931 address model and should not appear; district or suburb detail belongs in the address lines if needed.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty PostalAddress CitySubdivisionName
Common causes
- District/suburb fields mapped one-to-one from structured address data
- Assuming all UBL address children are allowed
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.