Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-306
What does UBL-CR-306 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty PostalAddress AddressFormatCode
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-306?
cbc:AddressFormatCode inside cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PostalAddress has no EN 16931 business term and should not appear. The core address model uses only the structured fields it defines, without a format code.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty PostalAddress AddressFormatCode
Common causes
- Legacy address formats expressed via AddressFormatCode
- Generic UBL address object emitted in full
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.