Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-300
What does UBL-CR-300 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty EndpointID
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-300?
cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cbc:EndpointID should not be included: EN 16931 defines electronic addresses only for the seller (BT-34) and buyer (BT-49), not for the tax representative (BG-11).
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the TaxRepresentativeParty EndpointID
Common causes
- Copying the seller party mapping (which emits EndpointID) to the tax representative
- Assuming every party needs a routing/endpoint address
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.