Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-286
What does UBL-CR-286 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the PayeeParty PartyLegalEntity HeadOfficeParty
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-286?
cac:PayeeParty/cac:PartyLegalEntity/cac:HeadOfficeParty has no business term in EN 16931 and should not be included. Nested party structures inside the payee's legal entity are not part of the core model.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the PayeeParty PartyLegalEntity HeadOfficeParty
Common causes
- Group/parent-company data mapped into the payee block
- Generic serializer emitting nested party objects from master data
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Check your invoice against this rule
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.