Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-269
What does UBL-CR-269 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the PayeeParty EndpointID
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-269?
EN 16931 defines a fixed set of business terms, and the UBL syntax binding marks every UBL element outside that set as not to be used. This rule (a warning) fires when the EndpointID element on the payee party (BG-10; an electronic address is modelled only for seller and buyer in EN 16931) is present: EndpointID at cac:PayeeParty/cbc:EndpointID has no corresponding business term in the core invoice model. Remove the element — receivers are not required to process it, so any data placed there may be silently ignored.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the PayeeParty EndpointID
Common causes
- Your UBL generator or ERP export populates the full UBL 2.1 schema, including EndpointID, instead of restricting output to the EN 16931 subset
- An invoice template copied from a generic (non-EN 16931) UBL sample carries the element along
- Mapping software transfers every available master-data field of the customer/payee into the XML rather than only the fields the standard supports
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.