Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 · rule
UBL-CR-177
What does UBL-CR-177 mean? A UBL invoice should not include the AccountingSupplierParty Party PartyTaxScheme TaxScheme JurisdictionRegionAddress
Why did my invoice fail UBL-CR-177?
This EN 16931 rule warns when the UBL element cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme/cac:TaxScheme/cac:JurisdictionRegionAddress is present: the invoice should not include a tax jurisdiction address inside the seller's tax scheme. EN 16931 does not model tax jurisdictions; the tax scheme carries only its identifier, so a JurisdictionRegionAddress has no corresponding business term. The element is not forbidden by UBL itself, but it lies outside the EN 16931 core invoice model, so remove it to keep the invoice fully conformant and interoperable.
Official rule text
A UBL invoice should not include the AccountingSupplierParty Party PartyTaxScheme TaxScheme JurisdictionRegionAddress
Common causes
- Mapping from a richer national or sector format that carried jurisdiction data
- Full UBL 2.1 schema-driven export enabling every optional element
- Copy-paste from a non-EN 16931 UBL sample invoice
Related rules
UBL-CR-001 · UBL-CR-002 · UBL-CR-003 · UBL-CR-004 · UBL-CR-005 · UBL-CR-006 · UBL-CR-007 · UBL-CR-008
Paste it into the live demo, or call POST /v1/validate. See the quickstart.